ear

Sei gegruesst , Egmont, das ist typisch englischer Humor, erinnert mich ein bisschen an Matt Harvey.Eccentricity, ein bisschen "Fun" und die ewige Suche nach einem "Geliebt Werden" : sehr geglueckt, ear.

      Egmont²

Dear Ear,

Thank you for your Positve repsonse. You Wrote that my Text is a bit Similer to that of Matt Harvey. and Zuppanova wrote that its similer to Paul Watzlawick. First of all i wrote to Matt Harvey and his response was:

Hello
I have no opinion
I do not understand
Have a wonderful October

Matt

I found it funny that most of the answers of the people here are divided into two types: the first is just saying that the grammer is not ok and you can say this and that word. the seconded type is people who try to always relate ones work to something he or she have already wrote.
I PERSONALY FOUND THESE KIND OF ANSWERS AS TOTALY UNCONSTRACTIVE.

the first type of people can not feel the the thema behind the words or sentances. and the seconed type have to put peoples ideas into small little boxes, just that they feel comftable with themselves with what they have learnt or read

they can be of course a text with bad grammer and yet a great feeling of something exciting and new. another way to say something...there is a thing called originality. Of course we are all influenced by what we learned or by what we have been educated and yet there is always room for a "dialectical proseess"

I thank you all just the same.
liebe Gruße
Egmont

      zuppanova

servus, Egmont, dear fellow!

reading your reply I got a flash in my mind, something like a
spotlight - and in this sudden glare light
I saw: YOU. it was so funny.
weißt du, was ich gesehen habe von dir?
I saw you plying two nice little ticky-tacky-boxes,
one for people like THESE,
and one for people like THOSE,
and I saw you locking up them poor users
of this lyrik-forum into these two boxes.
oh, what a great pity - cause:
now I’m asking myself all the time:
what is the difference
between YOU and THEM.
I’m thinking so hard about this question, believe me
or not.
have a wonderful October and
take good care of yourself.

with best regards: zup.

      Egmont²

Hi Ear and Zuppanove,
thank you for your responses,
By saying that if i put the line betwen people that put "things in boxes" to people who dont, then i also belong to those who "put the people that put things in boxes, into little boxes". But that of course you can say on every person that marks (states) a Dichotomy. for instance by saying that i dont like people who see things in "black and white"..but by saying that i of course divide people in "upper black and white status" and it goes on and on and on. I guess the question is on what level do i put the people in boxes or look at things in "black and white". i try not on the basic level - the first impresions i get from a person. Also I try to put them in the most "smallest box" there is, so that person in the "little box" in my head" is original and intresting -someone i can talk with,,,,

Regarding Matt´s reply i must admit i was a bit to hasty. He did reply me in the style of what i wrote: I have no opinion and I do not understand. I as the I in "I, Me and My self", which when you think about its quite funny and as you wrote wise.

well time to make a nice weekend´s coffee
Have all a great weekend
Egmont